<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ICANN Should Heed FTC&#8217;s Warning Over Overhaul of Domain Name System</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.fatlester.com/2012/01/ftc-ican-domain-name-system/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.fatlester.com/2012/01/ftc-ican-domain-name-system/</link>
	<description>Fat Lester&#039;s Domain Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:47:51 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
<xhtml:meta xmlns:xhtml="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml" name="robots" content="noindex" />
	<item>
		<title>By: Water Well Drilling Texas</title>
		<link>http://blog.fatlester.com/2012/01/ftc-ican-domain-name-system/#comment-12482</link>
		<dc:creator>Water Well Drilling Texas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 May 2012 13:47:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fatlester.com/?p=355#comment-12482</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While nothing bugs me worse than mistyping a url and getting redirected 5 times with screen pops there has to be a comprise on this issue.  I think just opening it wide up is a mistake but the internet is for everyone. If a &quot;lost language&quot; indigenous tribe wants to begin a network more power to them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While nothing bugs me worse than mistyping a url and getting redirected 5 times with screen pops there has to be a comprise on this issue.  I think just opening it wide up is a mistake but the internet is for everyone. If a &#8220;lost language&#8221; indigenous tribe wants to begin a network more power to them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://blog.fatlester.com/2012/01/ftc-ican-domain-name-system/#comment-12070</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 06:28:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fatlester.com/?p=355#comment-12070</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thanks for sharing your views on the subject.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for sharing your views on the subject.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ADvermain</title>
		<link>http://blog.fatlester.com/2012/01/ftc-ican-domain-name-system/#comment-12065</link>
		<dc:creator>ADvermain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fatlester.com/?p=355#comment-12065</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[&quot;There is also a significant risk to consumers of myriad new methods of committing fraud will inevitably arise if ICANN implements a system in which no name is protected and anyone can own the rights to any name, brand or combination of words regardless of the United States and other countries’ respective trademark and copyright laws.&quot;

I could not agree with you more on this topic, well said. A $185,000 application fee, and $25,000 annual fees for you own TLD! Just another way for them to make a ton of money. Lets see what this brings.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;There is also a significant risk to consumers of myriad new methods of committing fraud will inevitably arise if ICANN implements a system in which no name is protected and anyone can own the rights to any name, brand or combination of words regardless of the United States and other countries’ respective trademark and copyright laws.&#8221;</p>
<p>I could not agree with you more on this topic, well said. A $185,000 application fee, and $25,000 annual fees for you own TLD! Just another way for them to make a ton of money. Lets see what this brings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: register .pro</title>
		<link>http://blog.fatlester.com/2012/01/ftc-ican-domain-name-system/#comment-11822</link>
		<dc:creator>register .pro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Jan 2012 05:19:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.fatlester.com/?p=355#comment-11822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think that the domain system overhall is going to make a quick impact, since many domain extensions aren&#039;t going to appeal to a large group of keywords. Also, they are going to have to compete to get registries to even carry the extension. I&#039;ve been following the growth story of existing less known extensions like .pro and they are growing steadily and still haven&#039;t been picked up by every registrar.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think that the domain system overhall is going to make a quick impact, since many domain extensions aren&#8217;t going to appeal to a large group of keywords. Also, they are going to have to compete to get registries to even carry the extension. I&#8217;ve been following the growth story of existing less known extensions like .pro and they are growing steadily and still haven&#8217;t been picked up by every registrar.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
